<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The sum-product conjecture is false for real numbers · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.28781/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.28781/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The sum-product conjecture is false for real numbers — mentioned by mswphd</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48374457</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2605.28781:48374457</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 18:46:46 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking at LLMs applications to math might be instructive. A year ago when they had some preliminary claims/results, people would hypothesize they had the answer implicit in their training data (and so were being &amp;quot;better search&amp;quot;, but fundamentally doing derivative work). This may have been substantiated sometimes, I forget. Recently the tune has changed somewhat, say with LLM&amp;#x27;s approaches to Erdos problems (and in particular the unit distance problem. The LLM solution here spurred progress on another large problem, namely https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28781 ). There have been no claims that the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.28781/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item><item><title>The sum-product conjecture is false for real numbers — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48367019</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2605.28781:48367019</guid><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 07:15:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;The Sum-Product conjecture is false for real numbers&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;13 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.28781/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item><item><title>The sum-product conjecture is false for real numbers — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48318869</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2605.28781:48318869</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:00:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Humans have disproved the sum-product conjectures for real numbers&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.28781/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>math.NT</category></item></channel></rss>
