<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>MinerU-Popo: Universal Post-Processing Model for Structured Document Parsing · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.24973/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.24973/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>MinerU-Popo: Universal Post-Processing Model for Structured Document Parsing — mentioned by jbarrow</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654438</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2605.24973:48654438</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 02:33:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;m always glad to see more multi-page work in VLM-based OCR. Especially single-pass. One of the few other multi-page papers from recently, MinerU-Popo, treats fixing up multi-page outputs as a post-processing correction step (https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24973). Interesting to see the drop-off in quality as you up page count, though. I also think the attention approach (always attend to the image/prefix, with a sliding window for local context) is neat! I do wish they updated their comparison table to include more recent work (that scores marginally better on OmniDocBench), like dots.mocr.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.24973/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CV</category></item></channel></rss>
