https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.24319/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48310562urn:hackerpapers:submission:2605.24319:48310562Thu, 28 May 2026 15:40:12 GMT<p>Omissive Bias: Benchmarking LLM Answers to Ethical Decision-Making</p><p></p><p>2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.24319/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.LGhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302202urn:hackerpapers:mention:2605.24319:48302202Wed, 27 May 2026 23:29:46 GMT<p>&gt; study claims an https://xkcd.com/1288/ style replacement - &quot;study&quot; in a news headline increasingly just means &quot;a blog post except formatted with LaTeX to look scientific-ish and uploaded to arXiv&quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24319 &gt; In this paper, we ask a deliberately narrow question: when posed an everyday ethical question for which religious perspectives may be valuable, do LLMs invoke religion at all? so they prompted an LLM with ethical questions and are disappointed that it doesn&#x27;t bring up religion on its own, unprompted? also, their abstract talks only about ethical questions, but if…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.24319/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.LG