HackerPapers

arXiv:2605.22568cs.CR

Measuring Security Without Fooling Ourselves: Why Benchmarking Agents Is Hard

Sahar Abdelnabi, Chris Hicks, Konrad Rieck, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The benchmarks used to evaluate AI agents in security-critical roles suffer from crucial weaknesses. Building on recent empirical evidence, we characterize three core challenges that undermine security evaluations: benchmark vulnerabilities, temporal staleness, and runtime uncertainty. We then outline practical directions toward building more robust and trustworthy evaluation frameworks.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.CRCryptography and Security cs.AIArtificial Intelligence

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2026 to May 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.