https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.19516/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49272472urn:hackerpapers:submission:2605.19516:49272472Wed, 12 Aug 2026 13:55:26 GMT<p>Base Models Look Human to AI Detectors</p><p></p><p>2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.19516/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CLhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48892096urn:hackerpapers:mention:2605.19516:48892096Mon, 13 Jul 2026 13:07:22 GMT<p>Some of us use genAI as an accessibility tool. It enables people to write and publish work that otherwise wouldn&#x27;t exist. Some people already dismiss genuinely useful content solely based on the use of AI to assist in writing it - i am not sure what flagging would do other than to reinforce that prejudice. I posted a couple of my articles here, and the one that got traction was generally well received (and also received some constructive feedback from those who acknowledged that is was AI assisted) - but it is evident across HN there is a vocal minority who outright dismiss content solely…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.19516/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.CL