<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>SREGym: A Live Benchmark for AI SRE Agents with High-Fidelity Failure Scenarios · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.07161/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.07161/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>SREGym: A Live Benchmark for AI SRE Agents with High-Fidelity Failure Scenarios — mentioned by yimingsu</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49994294</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2605.07161:49994294</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:33:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes! All faults in SREGym-lite (and the parent benchmark SREGym) have their ground truths reviewed by us to ensure that they are accurate to the incident. In addition, we also conducted an analysis to ensure the LLM judge agrees with the human annotators too, which can be found on page 6 here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07161.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.07161/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
