<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>HeavySkill: Heavy Thinking as the Inner Skill in Agentic Harness · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.02396/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.02396/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>HeavySkill: Heavy Thinking as the Inner Skill in Agentic Harness — mentioned by politician</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497075</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2605.02396:48497075</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:08:17 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is why reasoning chains and reasoning chain verifiers are so important. We need to be able to see an argumentation, not just an answer. The paper below goes into this in more detail. HeavySkill: Heavy Thinking as the Inner Skill in Agentic Harness https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02396&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2605.02396/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
