<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Structured Output Benchmark: A Multi-Source Benchmark for Evaluating Structured Output Quality in Large Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2604.25359/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2604.25359/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Structured Output Benchmark: A Multi-Source Benchmark for Evaluating Structured Output Quality in Large Language Models — mentioned by khurdula</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47952568</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2604.25359:47952568</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:41:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;We saw that structured decoding didn&amp;#x27;t make a difference in the quality of the output. Check out the paper section &amp;quot;6.3 Structured Decoding Ablation&amp;quot; Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.25359 We ran the comparison and saw no difference, so to keep the bench consistent since some models don&amp;#x27;t support structured decoding we used greedy decoding on all models.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2604.25359/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
