<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Efficient Classical Simulation of Heuristic Peaked Quantum Circuits · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2604.21908/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2604.21908/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Efficient Classical Simulation of Heuristic Peaked Quantum Circuits — mentioned by lkm0</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47902705</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2604.21908:47902705</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 16:38:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;dequantization&amp;quot; is a thing and it&amp;#x27;s a very legitimate part of quantum information research. It&amp;#x27;s useful to probe if something was truly quantum or just smokes and mirrors, because it helps us understand where the boundary between quantum and classical lies. Another dequantized result from the past days: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21908&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2604.21908/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
