HackerPapers

arXiv:2604.21691stat.ML

There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learning

Jamie Simon, Daniel Kunin, Alexander Atanasov, Enric Boix-Adserà, Blake Bordelon, Jeremy Cohen, Nikhil Ghosh, Florentin Guth, Arthur Jacot, Mason Kamb, Dhruva Karkada, Eric J. Michaud, Berkan Ottlik, Joseph Turnbull

Abstract

In this paper, we make the case that a scientific theory of deep learning is emerging. By this we mean a theory which characterizes important properties and statistics of the training process, hidden representations, final weights, and performance of neural networks. We pull together major strands of ongoing research in deep learning theory and identify five growing bodies of work that point toward such a theory: (a) solvable idealized settings that provide intuition for learning dynamics in realistic systems; (b) tractable limits that reveal insights into fundamental learning phenomena; (c) simple mathematical laws that capture important macroscopic observables; (d) theories of hyperparameters that disentangle them from the rest of the training process, leaving simpler systems behind; and (e) universal behaviors shared across systems and settings which clarify which phenomena call for explanation. Taken together, these bodies of work share certain broad traits: they are concerned with the dynamics of the training process; they primarily seek to describe coarse aggregate statistics; and they emphasize falsifiable quantitative predictions. We argue that the emerging theory is best thought of as a mechanics of the learning process, and suggest the name learning mechanics. We discuss the relationship between this mechanics perspective and other approaches for building a theory of deep learning, including the statistical and information-theoretic perspectives. In particular, we anticipate a symbiotic relationship between learning mechanics and mechanistic interpretability. We also review and address common arguments that fundamental theory will not be possible or is not important. We conclude with a portrait of important open directions in learning mechanics and advice for beginners. We host further introductory materials, perspectives, and open questions at learningmechanics.pub.

arXiv comments
41 pages, 6 figures
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
stat.MLMachine Learning (Statistics) cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 3 identifiable commenters in 3 comments across 3 threads, from May 2026 to Sep 2026. Found in 1 HN submission from Apr 2026 to Apr 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments3 threads

    • A group already (sort-of) has for the broader theory: https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21691 It's a good list, but "alignment" is much more targetted. I attended a workshop with researchers from OpenAI and Anthropic also present, where the objective was to hash out what the problems…

      hodgehog11View on HNParent context

  1. How LLMs work 1 comment
    • This is essentially an open research question. ML theory is unfortunately very weak relative to where the empirics are. I think there's a relatively optimistic paper that was posted a while back here but I would also take it with a grain of salt. https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.21691…

      inkysigmaView on HNParent context

  2. A Theory of Deep Learning 1 comment
    • This essay seems to be related to the paper "There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learning" [1] which was discussed here recently [2]. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.21691 [2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47893779

      smokelView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.