<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2604.14210/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2604.14210/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Chinese Language Is Not More Efficient Than English in Vibe Coding: A Preliminary Study on Token Cost and Problem-Solving Rate — mentioned by altairprime</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49863143</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2604.14210:49863143</guid><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 03:41:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Perhaps relevant: Chinese language is not more efficient than English in vibe coding: A preliminary study on token cost and problem-solving rate https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.14210v1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2604.14210/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
