HackerPapers

arXiv:2604.06222q-bio.NC

The Geometry of Forgetting

Sambartha Ray Barman, Andrey Starenky, Sophia Bodnar, Nikhil Narasimhan, Ashwin Gopinath

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Why do we forget? Why do we remember things that never happened? The conventional answer points to biological hardware. We propose a different one: geometry. Here we show that high-dimensional embedding spaces, subjected to noise, interference, and temporal degradation, reproduce quantitative signatures of human memory with no phenomenon-specific engineering. Power-law forgetting ($b = 0.460 \pm 0.183$, human $b \approx 0.5$) arises from interference among competing memories, not from decay. The identical decay function without competitors yields $b \approx 0.009$, fifty times smaller. Time alone does not produce forgetting in this system. Competition does. Production embedding models (nominally 384--1{,}024 dimensions) concentrate their variance in only ${\sim}16$ effective dimensions, placing them deep in the interference-vulnerable regime. False memories require no engineering at all: cosine similarity on unmodified pre-trained embeddings reproduces the Deese--Roediger--McDermott false alarm rate ($0.583$ versus human ${\sim}0.55$) with zero parameter tuning and no boundary conditions. We did not build a false memory system. We found one already present in the raw geometry of semantic space. These results suggest that core memory phenomena are not bugs of biological implementation but features of any system that organizes information by meaning and retrieves it by proximity.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
q-bio.NCNeurons and Cognition cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.IRInformation Retrieval cs.NENeural and Evolutionary Computing

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Apr 2026 to Apr 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.