HackerPapers

arXiv:2604.04949cs.IR

Learning to Retrieve from Agent Trajectories

Yuqi Zhou, Sunhao Dai, Changle Qu, Liang Pang, Jun Xu, Ji-Rong Wen

Early discovery. Linked by one identifiable commenter. This paper is outside the main ranking; a mention is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Information retrieval (IR) systems have traditionally been designed and trained for human users, with learning-to-rank methods relying heavily on large-scale human interaction logs such as clicks and dwell time. With the rapid emergence of large language model (LLM) powered search agents, however, retrieval is increasingly consumed by agents rather than human beings, and is embedded as a core component within multi-turn reasoning and action loops. In this setting, retrieval models trained under human-centric assumptions exhibit a fundamental mismatch with the way agents issue queries and consume results. In this work, we argue that retrieval models for agentic search should be trained directly from agent interaction data. We introduce learning to retrieve from agent trajectories as a new training paradigm, where supervision is derived from multi-step agent interactions. Through a systematic analysis of search agent trajectories, we identify key behavioral signals that reveal document utility, including browsing actions, unbrowsed rejections, and post-browse reasoning traces. Guided by these insights, we propose LRAT, a simple yet effective framework that mines high-quality retrieval supervision from agent trajectories and incorporates relevance intensity through weighted optimization. Extensive experiments on both in-domain and out-of-domain deep research benchmarks demonstrate that retrievers trained with LRAT consistently improve evidence recall, end-to-end task success, and execution efficiency across diverse agent architectures and scales. Our results highlight agent trajectories as a practical and scalable supervision source, pointing to a promising direction for retrieval in the era of agentic search.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.IRInformation Retrieval cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.CLComputation and Language

On Hacker News

Linked by 1 identifiable commenter in 1 comment across 1 thread, from Aug 2026 to Aug 2026.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments1 thread

    • > The blog post appears to get confused and devotes its entire second half to pitching Keenable itself. If the idea is to build credibility for the new benchmark, this maybe was not the best choice. The exact sentence you cite is an example that I've tried everything I could to…

      phoenix120View on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.