<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Capability Safety as Datalog: A Foundational Equivalence · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2603.26725/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2603.26725/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Capability Safety as Datalog: A Foundational Equivalence — mentioned by hierophantos</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47883854</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2603.26725:47883854</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:04:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I wanted to ask perhaps an impossible question on this notion that I&amp;#x27;ve been chewing on — particularly around the composition of &amp;quot;capabilities&amp;quot; (LLM sense of the word) and what they could acquire through some transitive closure over their &amp;quot;capability set(s)&amp;quot; in a multi-agent scenario. I stumbled into two recent papers, thinking that it was about &amp;quot;capabilities&amp;quot; in the OCap sense and datalog (a related technology to what I&amp;#x27;m working on): • https://arxiv.org/html/2603.26725 Capability Safety as Datalog: A Foundational Equivalence; Cosimo Spera; March 2026 • https://arxiv.org/html/2603.15973…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2603.26725/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LO</category></item></channel></rss>
