ARC-AGI-3: A New Challenge for Frontier Agentic Intelligence · HackerPapers discussions

ARC-AGI-3: A New Challenge for Frontier Agentic Intelligence — mentioned by scronkfinkle

Wed, 12 Aug 2026 14:27:47 GMT

> So then you need to explain ARC-AGI-3: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24621 I don't, we originally had the turing test which was designed to determine human intelligence by its ability to imitate us with natural dialogue, but we've since defeated that. I stated "to me" because it's my personal opinion on a definition whose goalpost will probably never stop being moved. > Back 1996, EQP automatically solved the Robbins conjecture. But nobody concluded EQP was generally intelligent. EQP doesn't have the 3 criteria I outlined, which were different than "solving a math problem"

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

ARC-AGI-3: A New Challenge for Frontier Agentic Intelligence — mentioned by root-parent

Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:35:00 GMT

>> To me, this is more or less what I would think "Artificial General Intelligence" is So then you need to explain ARC-AGI-3: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.24621 "Our testing shows humans can solve 100% of the environments, in contrast to frontier AI systems which, as of March 2026, score below 1%." Back 1996, EQP automatically solved the Robbins conjecture. But nobody concluded EQP was generally intelligent. https://www.cs.unm.edu/~mccune/papers/robbins/

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

ARC-AGI-3: A New Challenge for Frontier Agentic Intelligence — HN submission

Thu, 06 Aug 2026 12:10:33 GMT

ARC-AGI-3: A New Challenge for Frontier Agentic Intelligence

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

ARC-AGI-3: A New Challenge for Frontier Agentic Intelligence — HN submission

Mon, 30 Mar 2026 19:54:07 GMT

ARC-AGI-3: A New Challenge for Frontier Agentic Intelligence

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.