HackerPapers

arXiv:2603.23928math.DS

On the paucity of lattice triangles

David Kurniadi Angdinata, Evan Chen, Ken Ono, Jesse Thorner, Jiaxin Zhang, Jujian Zhang

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

A rational triangle $T$ (one whose angles are rational multiples of $π$) unfolds to a translation surface ${X_T}$. The lattice triangle problem asks to classify those $T$ for which ${X_T}$ is a Veech (lattice) surface, which means that the $\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb R)$-orbit of ${X_T}$ is closed in its stratum (so its projection to moduli space is a Teichmüller curve). The most mysterious regime is the "hard obtuse window" (largest angle in $(π/2,2π/3]$), where it is conjectured that no lattice triangles exist. Using an arithmetic reformulation of the Mirzakhani-Wright rank obstruction, we prove a quantitative theorem that rules out all but a proportion $n^{-1+o(1)}$ of the triangles in this window with denominator $n$. The main technical result in our proof was autoformalized by AxiomProver in Lean (using mathlib).

arXiv comments
The paper is significantly revised based on referee comments. And, Jesse Thorner is added as a co-author
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
math.DSDynamical Systems math.COCombinatorics math.NTNumber Theory

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

  • Lattice Triangles Are Rare

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23928 https://github.com/AxiomMath/lattice-triangle

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.