HackerPapers

arXiv:2603.23685econ.TH

The Economics of Builder Saturation in Digital Markets

Armin Catovic

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

Recent advances in generative AI systems have dramatically reduced the cost of digital production, fueling narratives that widespread participation in software creation will yield a proliferation of viable companies. This paper challenges that assumption. We introduce the Builder Saturation Effect, formalizing a model in which production scales elastically but human attention remains finite. In markets with near-zero marginal costs and free entry, increases in the number of producers dilute average attention and returns per producer, even as total output expands. Extending the framework to incorporate quality heterogeneity and reinforcement dynamics, we show that equilibrium outcomes exhibit declining average payoffs and increasing concentration, consistent with power-law-like distributions. These results suggest that AI-enabled, democratised production is more likely to intensify competition and produce winner-take-most outcomes than to generate broadly distributed entrepreneurial success. Contribution type: This paper is primarily a work of synthesis and applied formalisation. The individual theoretical ingredients - attention scarcity, free-entry dilution, superstar effects, preferential attachment - are well established in their respective literatures. The contribution is to combine them into a unified framework and direct the resulting predictions at a specific contemporary claim about AI-enabled entrepreneurship.

arXiv comments
22 pages, 3 figures. Preprint. This paper develops a simple economic model of attention-constrained entry in digital markets, synthesizing results from industrial organization and network science, with applications to AI-enabled production
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
econ.THTheoretical Economics cs.CYComputers and Society cs.GTComputer Science and Game Theory cs.LGMachine Learning econ.GNGeneral Economics

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 2 HN submissions from Mar 2026 to Mar 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

  • Why AI may increase competition but not success rates
  • Show HN: The Economics of Builder Saturation in Digital Markets

    I formalised something most of us already feel but rarely say out loud: making things easier to build doesn't make things easier to succeed with. Personal version: I've vibe-coded maybe 15 projects since the beginning of this year. Two are still alive. At work, our teams built hundreds of custom GPTs and dashboards. Handful survived. The failure mode was never "couldn't build it" - it was "nobody had the bandwidth to care." So I wrote a paper about it. It combines Herbert Simon's attention…

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.