<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>From Technical Debt to Cognitive and Intent Debt: Rethinking Software Health in the Age of AI · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2603.22106/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2603.22106/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>From Technical Debt to Cognitive and Intent Debt: Rethinking Software Health in the Age of AI — mentioned by margaretstorey</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48022750</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2603.22106:48022750</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 14:08:21 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice to read the discussion here. A few mentioned cognitive debt is not new, I agree. Large systems have always been beyond the reach of individual understanding (Naur and others have written about this for decades). What I&amp;#x27;m curious to investigate is whether AI is amplifying and changing the nature of cognitive debt as code and system features are generated faster than teams can build shared understanding. Some of the discussion around specs, contracts and accountability touch on how we can manage intent, especially as systems evolve. I&amp;#x27;ve been working on a broader frame around technical…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2603.22106/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
