HackerPapers

arXiv:2603.15569cs.LG

Mamba-3: Improved Sequence Modeling using State Space Principles

Aakash Lahoti, Kevin Y. Li, Berlin Chen, Caitlin Wang, Aviv Bick, J. Zico Kolter, Tri Dao, Albert Gu

Abstract

Scaling inference-time compute has emerged as an important driver of LLM performance, making inference efficiency a central focus of model design alongside model quality. While the current Transformer-based models deliver strong model quality, their quadratic compute and linear memory make inference expensive. This has spurred the development of sub-quadratic models with reduced linear compute and constant memory requirements. However, many recent linear models trade off model quality and capability for algorithmic efficiency, failing on tasks such as state tracking. Moreover, their theoretically linear inference remains hardware-inefficient in practice. Guided by an inference-first perspective, we introduce three core methodological improvements inspired by the state space model (SSM) viewpoint of linear models. We combine: (1) a more expressive recurrence derived from SSM discretization, (2) a complex-valued state update rule that enables richer state tracking, and (3) a multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) formulation for better model performance without increasing decode latency. Together with architectural refinements, our Mamba-3 model achieves significant gains across retrieval, state-tracking, and downstream language modeling tasks. At the 1.5B scale, Mamba-3 improves average downstream accuracy by 0.6 percentage points compared to the next best model (Gated DeltaNet), with Mamba-3's MIMO variant further improving accuracy by another 1.2 points for a total 1.8 point gain. Across state-size experiments, Mamba-3 achieves comparable perplexity to Mamba-2 despite using half of its predecessor's state size. Our evaluations demonstrate Mamba-3's ability to advance the performance-efficiency Pareto frontier.

arXiv comments
ICLR 2026
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.LGMachine Learning

On Hacker News

Linked by 2 identifiable commenters in 2 comments across 2 threads, from Mar 2026 to Oct 2026. Found in 1 HN submission from Mar 2026 to Mar 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments2 threads

    • No my point is more general. The headline promises me that I don't need attention based transformers, then you see the benchmarks and they tell you they got 10% worse perplexity. How is that going to convince me that I don't need attention? I mean if you look at e.g Mamba 3 [0]…

      imtringuedView on HNParent context

  1. Mamba-3 1 comment

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.