HackerPapers

arXiv:2603.15298cs.SE

The Impact of AI-Assisted Development on Software Security: A Study of Gemini and Developer Experience

Nadine Jost, Benjamin Berens, Manuel Karl, Stefan Albert Horstmann, Martin Johns, Alena Naiakshina

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

The ongoing shortage of skilled developers, particularly in security-critical software development, has led organizations to increasingly adopt AI-powered development tools to boost productivity and reduce reliance on limited human expertise. These tools, often based on large language models, aim to automate routine tasks and make secure software development more accessible and efficient. However, it remains unclear how developers' general programming and security-specific experience, and the type of AI tool used (free vs. paid) affect the security of the resulting software. Therefore, we conducted a quantitative programming study with software developers (n=159) exploring the impact of Google's AI tool Gemini on code security. Participants were assigned a security-related programming task using either no AI tools, the free version, or the paid version of Gemini. While we did not observe significant differences between using Gemini in terms of secure software development, programming experience significantly improved code security and cannot be fully substituted by Gemini.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.SESoftware Engineering cs.HCHuman-Computer Interaction

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from May 2026 to May 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.