<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Has quantum advantage been achieved? · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2603.09901/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2603.09901/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Has quantum advantage been achieved? — mentioned by svat</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848105</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2603.09901:47848105</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 12:53:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The bet is not “are you 100% sure a CRQC [cryptographically-relevant quantum computer] will exist in 2030?”, the bet is “are you 100% sure a CRQC will NOT exist in 2030?” — from https://words.filippo.io/crqc-timeline/ &amp;quot;A Cryptography Engineer’s Perspective on Quantum Computing Timelines&amp;quot;, the OP&amp;#x27;s blog post from two weeks ago, and the first link in this one. [HN discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662234] Yes today&amp;#x27;s quantum computers cannot factor 21, but enough progress is happening fast enough that now there&amp;#x27;s a &amp;gt;1% chance they will go much further in (say) five years.…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2603.09901/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Has quantum advantage been achieved? — mentioned by Strilanc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47339058</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2603.09901:47339058</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 18:08:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Minor update: Dominik condensed the blog posts into a pre-print: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09901&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2603.09901/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>Has quantum advantage been achieved? — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47334174</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2603.09901:47334174</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:20:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Has quantum advantage been achieved?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2603.09901/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
