LDP: An Identity-Aware Protocol for Multi-Agent LLM Systems — mentioned by prakashsunil

Wed, 18 Mar 2026 18:06:20 GMT

Author of LDP here [1]. The core issue seems to be that the security boundary lived inside the agent loop. If the model can request execution outside the sandbox, then the sandbox is not really an external boundary. One design principle we explored in LDP is that constraints should be enforced outside the prompt/context layer — in the runtime, protocol, or approval layer — not by relying on the model to obey instructions. Not a silver bullet, but I think that architectural distinction matters here. [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.08852

Paper and discussion history. A mention is not an endorsement.

LDP: An Identity-Aware Protocol for Multi-Agent LLM Systems — HN submission

Fri, 13 Mar 2026 17:00:53 GMT

LDP: Identity-Aware Routing for Multi-Agent LLMs – 37% Less Tokens

2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. Paper and source history. A submission is not an endorsement.

LDP: An Identity-Aware Protocol for Multi-Agent LLM Systems · HackerPapers discussions

LDP: An Identity-Aware Protocol for Multi-Agent LLM Systems — mentioned by prakashsunil

LDP: An Identity-Aware Protocol for Multi-Agent LLM Systems — HN submission