HackerPapers

arXiv:2603.03823cs.SE

SWE-CI: Evaluating Agent Capabilities in Maintaining Codebases via Continuous Integration

Jialong Chen, Xander Xu, Hu Wei, Chuan Chen, Bing Zhao

Abstract

Large language model (LLM)-powered agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in automating software engineering tasks such as static bug fixing. However, in the real world, the development of mature software is typically predicated on complex requirement changes and long-term feature iterations -- a process that static, one-shot repair paradigms fail to capture. To bridge this gap, we propose SWE-CI, the first repository-level benchmark built upon the Continuous Integration loop, aiming to shift the evaluation paradigm for code generation from static, short-term functional correctness toward dynamic, long-term maintainability. The key insight is simple: Maintainability can be revealed by tracking how functional correctness changes over time. The benchmark comprises 100 tasks, each deriving from a real-world code repository with a development history spanning an average of 233 days and 71 consecutive commits. SWE-CI requires agents to systematically resolve these tasks through dozens of rounds of analysis and coding iterations. SWE-CI provides valuable insights into how well agents can sustain code quality throughout long-term evolution.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.SESoftware Engineering cs.AIArtificial Intelligence cs.CLComputation and Language

On Hacker News

Linked by 4 identifiable commenters in 4 comments across 4 threads, from Mar 2026 to Oct 2026. Found in 2 HN submissions from Mar 2026 to Mar 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments4 threads

  1. GLM 5.2 vs. Opus 1 comment
    • There are upcoming benchmarks aimed at measuring the ability to work with brownfield tasks. (Of course, benchmarks can be gamed, but they are still better than unrealistic toy tasks that earlier generations of benchmarks used. Frontier labs are yet to use them in their tech…

      keheliyaView on HNParent context

    • Nah, it's a skill issue on the part of those who believe in "agent swarms" (in fact, that's how I recognise AI noobs; they think swarms work). Studies (like this [1]) and Anthropic's experiements have told us they don't. We do experiments with software correctness and formal…

      pronView on HNParent context

    • The study is likely "SWE-CI: Evaluating Agent Capabilities in Maintaining Codebases via Continuous Integration". Regression rate plot is figure 6. Read the study to understand what it is measuring and how it was measured. As I understand parent's summary is fine, but you want to…

      sanxiynView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.