<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>dLLM: Simple Diffusion Language Modeling · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2602.22661/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:27:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2602.22661/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>dLLM: Simple Diffusion Language Modeling — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47336498</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2602.22661:47336498</guid><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 15:00:02 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Diffusion LLM may make most of the AI engineering stack obsolete&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#x27;ve been deep-diving into diffusion language models this week and I think this is the most underrated direction in AI right now. The core issue with autoregressive LLMs: Every major model today (GPT, Claude, Gemini) generates one token at a time, left to right. Each token depends on the previous one. This single architectural constraint has shaped the entire AI industry: - Models can&amp;#x27;t revise what they already wrote → we build chain-of-thought, reflection, and multi-pass reasoning to force them to &amp;quot;think before committing&amp;quot; - One forward pass per token → we invest heavily in speculative…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2602.22661/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
