HackerPapers

arXiv:2602.20082cs.PL

Machine-Generated, Machine-Checked Proofs for a Verified Compiler (Experience Report)

Zoe Paraskevopoulou

HN submission. Found in a submission link or body. Submitters do not count as commenters in the main ranking; a submission is not an endorsement.

Abstract

We report on using an agentic coding assistant (Claude Code, powered by Claude Opus 4.6) to mechanize a substantial Rocq correctness proof from scratch, with human guidance but without human proof writing. The proof establishes semantic preservation for the administrative normal form (ANF) transformation in the CertiCoq verified compiler for Rocq. The closely related continuation-passing style (CPS) transformation in CertiCoq was previously proved correct by human experts over several months. We use this proof as a template and instruct the LLM to adapt the proof technique to the ANF setting, which differs in important technical ways. The resulting ANF proof comprises approximately 7,800 lines of Rocq (larger than the 5,300-line CPS proof) and was developed in approximately 96 hours. We describe the proof technique and report on the experience of developing it with an LLM, discussing both the strengths and limitations of the approach and its implications for verified compiler construction.

arXiv comments
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.PLProgramming Languages

On Hacker News

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Found in 1 HN submission from Apr 2026 to Apr 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments0 threads

No comments linking this paper were found in the collected sources. Open submission discussions.

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.