<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Measuring Mid-2025 LLM-Assistance on Novice Performance in Biology · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2602.16703/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2602.16703/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Measuring Mid-2025 LLM-Assistance on Novice Performance in Biology — mentioned by jefftk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49104978</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2602.16703:49104978</guid><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:59:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an important question, but because of the danger of trying to do it for real it&amp;#x27;s not one SecureBio has taken or is likely to take on. Instead we and others in the field have generally tried to work through proxies: is there something that is about as hard while not being dangerous? The closest I can think to testing whether &amp;quot;someone smart but completely untrained / unfamiliar with biology&amp;quot; can cause harm now is ActiveSite&amp;#x27;s study (https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16703) which was a null result with models from a year ago. But: 1. The main worry isn&amp;#x27;t current models, but near-future…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2602.16703/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
