<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Measuring and Mitigating Post-hoc Rationalization in Reverse Chain-of-Thought Generation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2602.14469/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2602.14469/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Measuring and Mitigating Post-hoc Rationalization in Reverse Chain-of-Thought Generation — mentioned by genxy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49266259</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2602.14469:49266259</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:15:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Post hoc rationalization The choice we made for other reasons is the best one for these constructed reasons that didn&amp;#x27;t exist until later. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice-supportive_bias Measuring and Mitigating Post-hoc Rationalization in Reverse Chain-of-Thought Generation https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14469&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2602.14469/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
