<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Building a Correct-by-Design Lakehouse. Data Contracts, Versioning, and Transactional Pipelines for Humans and Agents · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2602.02335/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2602.02335/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Building a Correct-by-Design Lakehouse. Data Contracts, Versioning, and Transactional Pipelines for Humans and Agents — mentioned by jtagliabuetooso</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47951532</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2602.02335:47951532</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 17:26:07 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Data contracts as types and compile time checks (even across languages) are not new - this is a recent paper exposing the idea of correctness-by-design pipeline, which is a super set of this particular issue obviously (disclaimer: I&amp;#x27;m one of the author of the paper): https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.02335&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2602.02335/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.DC</category></item></channel></rss>
