<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.18734/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.18734/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models — mentioned by teleforce</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48694517</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2601.18734:48694517</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 02:18:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;True, but the capabilities and knowledge of that model are also frozen in time, so the value of that model declines over time. Correction: The capabilities and knowledge of that model can be improved via self-distillation, so the value of that model increases over time. This is where I think self-distillation is the main way forward, and probably the second best thing ever happened to AI/LLM after the transformer. Based on self-distillation, the value of the open weights models will incease over time for sub-specialization through post-training and fine-tuning. Please check these very…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.18734/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models — mentioned by teleforce</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317980</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2601.18734:48317980</guid><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 01:48:04 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Please check the recent self-distillation work by MIT-ETH, UCLA and Apple [1],[2],[3],[4],[5]. Given the release timelines I suspect all 4.x after Opus 4 are probably self-distillation based fine-tuned models. The latest paper by Apple is focusing on code generation using the simple technique hence the name simple self-distillation (SSD) [4],[5]. I&amp;#x27;ve got a strong feeling that self-distillation is the second best thing happened to LLM after transformer breakthrough. [1]Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learning [pdf] (25 comments): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48165265 [2]…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.18734/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item><item><title>Self-Distilled Reasoner: On-Policy Self-Distillation for Large Language Models — mentioned by teleforce</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166163</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2601.18734:48166163</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 05:01:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Fun facts, this paper is cited by Simple Self-Distillation (SSD) paper by Apple [1],[2]. I think it is a bad naming scheme due to the very common SSD namesake and the fact that it belongs to on-policy self-distillation [3]. But again according to the authors their proposed solution is simple because &amp;quot;SSD uses only temperature-shifted samples from the base model and standard cross-entropy training,without privileged context, feedback-conditioned teachers,or auxiliary supervision.&amp;quot; The Apple paper also cited another very similar idea of self-distillation paper by UCLA team. Both cited papers…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.18734/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
