<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>On the Insecurity of Keystroke-Based AI Authorship Detection: Timing-Forgery Attacks Against Motor-Signal Verification · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.17280/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.17280/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>On the Insecurity of Keystroke-Based AI Authorship Detection: Timing-Forgery Attacks Against Motor-Signal Verification — mentioned by hackingonempty</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46805517</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2601.17280:46805517</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 03:39:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A paper on this was just submitted. &amp;quot;We demonstrate that this class of defenses is insecure against two practical attack classes: the copy-type attack, in which a human transcribes LLM-generated text producing authentic motor signals, and timing-forgery attacks, in which automated agents sample inter-keystroke intervals from empirical human distributions.&amp;quot; https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.17280v1 There are tons of USB dongles available for about $10 containing a programmable microcontroller. You connect to the dongle from another device over wifi and it can act like a keyboard typing out whatever…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.17280/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
