<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Replayable Financial Agents: A Determinism-Faithfulness Assurance Harness for Tool-Using LLM Agents · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.15322/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.15322/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Replayable Financial Agents: A Determinism-Faithfulness Assurance Harness for Tool-Using LLM Agents — mentioned by raffisk</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46733783</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2601.15322:46733783</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 15:39:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Introed Determinism-Faithfulness assurance harness (DFAH) in new paper &amp;quot;Replayable Financial Agents&amp;quot; along with the open-source code A few findings: - Determinism and faithfulness are positively correlated (r = 0.45) for the tasks in my experiments - Schema-first Tier 1 (7–20B) stays near the 95% compliance threshold under stress. - Frontier models performed well on some tasks (e.g., strong action determinism in agentic triage), but the matrix helps define when HITL is still needed. note: I didn&amp;#x27;t have control of inferencing engines, or infra for these experiments, leveraged local…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.15322/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
