<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>If You Want Coherence, Orchestrate a Team of Rivals: Multi-Agent Models of Organizational Intelligence · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.14351/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.14351/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>If You Want Coherence, Orchestrate a Team of Rivals: Multi-Agent Models of Organizational Intelligence — mentioned by stacktraceyo</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49570180</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2601.14351:49570180</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 21:04:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14351&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.14351/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.MA</category></item><item><title>If You Want Coherence, Orchestrate a Team of Rivals: Multi-Agent Models of Organizational Intelligence — mentioned by gopalv</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46864780</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2601.14351:46864780</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 00:57:39 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; Making models larger improves overall accuracy but doesn&amp;#x27;t reliably reduce incoherence on hard problems. Coherence requires 2 opposing forces to hold coherence in one dimension and at least 3 of them in higher dimensions of quality. My team wrote up a paper titled &amp;quot;If You Want Coherence, Orchestrate a Team of Rivals&amp;quot;[1] because we kept finding that upping the reasoning threshold resulted in less coherence - more experimentation before we hit a dead-end to turn around. So we had a better result from using Haiku (we fail over to Sonnet) over Opus and using a higher reasoning model to…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.14351/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.MA</category></item><item><title>If You Want Coherence, Orchestrate a Team of Rivals: Multi-Agent Models of Organizational Intelligence — mentioned by gopalv</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46852805</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2601.14351:46852805</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 05:38:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; The paper sounds too shallow. The errors data doesn&amp;#x27;t seem to have a rationale or correlation against the architecture. Specifically, what makes the SAS architecture to have lowest error rates while the similar architecture with independent agents having highest error rates? I can believe SAS works great until the context has errors which were corrected - there seems to be a leakage between past mistakes and new ones, if you leave them all in one context window. My team wrote a similar paper[1] last month, but we found the orchestrator is not the core component, but a specialized evaluator…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.14351/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.MA</category></item><item><title>If You Want Coherence, Orchestrate a Team of Rivals: Multi-Agent Models of Organizational Intelligence — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46802368</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2601.14351:46802368</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 22:16:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Show HN: If You Want Coherence, Orchestrate a Team of Rivals: Multi-Agent &amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;10 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.14351/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.MA</category></item></channel></rss>
