<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Criminal Liability of Generative Artificial Intelligence Providers for User-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.03788/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.03788/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Criminal Liability of Generative Artificial Intelligence Providers for User-Generated Child Sexual Abuse Material — mentioned by 317070</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46882664</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2601.03788:46882664</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 07:35:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, there is evidence that this company made and distributed CSAM and pornographic deepfakes to make a profit. There is no evidence lacking there for the investigators. So the question becomes if it was done knowingly or recklessly, hence a police raid for evidence. See also [0] for a legal discussion in the German context. [0] https://arxiv.org/html/2601.03788v1&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2601.03788/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CY</category></item></channel></rss>
