<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Nested Learning: The Illusion of Deep Learning Architectures · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.24695/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.24695/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Nested Learning: The Illusion of Deep Learning Architectures — mentioned by andy12_</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47325451</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2512.24695:47325451</guid><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 16:28:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Putting stuff you have learned into a markdown file is a very &amp;quot;shallow&amp;quot; version of continual learning. It can remember facts, yes, but I doubt a model can master new out-of-distribution tasks this way. If anything, I think that Google&amp;#x27;s Titans[1] and Hope[2] architectures are more aligned with true continual learning (without being actual continual learning still, which is why they call it &amp;quot;test-time memorization&amp;quot;). [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.00663 [2] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.24695&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.24695/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.LG</category></item></channel></rss>
