<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>T5Gemma 2: Seeing, Reading, and Understanding Longer · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.14856/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.14856/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>T5Gemma 2: Seeing, Reading, and Understanding Longer — mentioned by sundarurfriend</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46322041</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2512.14856:46322041</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 03:37:24 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This made me compare the figures, and: did they accidentally switch those around, or are the Post-training Reasoning and Factuality scores actually significantly lower than the Pre-training ones? Edit: Just noticed &amp;gt; Also note pre-training and post-training benchmarks are different, so scores are not comparable across plots. The paper gives more details about the specific benchmarks and the scores obtained in them: https://arxiv.org/html/2512.14856v1#S4&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.14856/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
