HackerPapers

arXiv:2512.09643astro-ph.EP

An Orbital House of Cards: Frequent Satellite Close Conjunctions

Sarah Thiele, Skye R. Heiland, Aaron C. Boley, Samantha M. Lawler

Abstract

The number of objects in orbit is rapidly increasing, primarily driven by the launch of megaconstellations, an approach to satellite constellation design that involves large numbers of satellites paired with their rapid launch and disposal, as well as the overall proliferation of satellite systems. While satellites provide many benefits to society, their use comes with challenges, including the growth of space debris, collision risks, ground casualty risks, optical and radio-spectrum pollution, and the alteration of Earth's upper atmosphere through rocket emissions and reentry ablation. There is potential for current or planned actions in orbit to cause serious degradation of the orbital environment or lead to catastrophic outcomes, highlighting the urgent need to find better ways to quantify stress on the orbital environment. Here we propose a new metric, the CRASH Clock, that measures such stress in terms of the timescale for a possible catastrophic collision to occur if there are no satellite maneuvers or there is a severe loss in situational awareness. Our calculations show that the CRASH Clock is 5.5 days as of June 2025 and continues to decrease, which suggests there is limited time to recover from a wide-spread disruptive event, such as a solar storm. This is in stark contrast to the pre-megaconstellation era: in 2018, the CRASH Clock was 164 days.

arXiv comments
Accepted version for Acta Astronautica. 20 pages, 5 figures
Journal reference
DOI
doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2026.06.023
Subjects
astro-ph.EPEarth and Planetary Astrophysics

On Hacker News

Linked by 4 identifiable commenters in 4 comments across 4 threads, from Jan 2026 to Jun 2026. Found in 1 HN submission from Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments4 threads

  1. SpaceX to buy Cursor for $60B 1 comment
    • Not so much Ukraine using drones that use starlink, more the sheer number of starlink sats up and planned, the numbers in the proposed other constellations going up and planned, and the ongoing propensity of Chinese rockets to fragment after use rather than safely de orbit. For…

      defrostView on HNParent context

    • LEO is crowded enough (mostly with Starlink) that satellites have to actively maneuver to avoid collisions [1]. There's research [2] arguing that we're probably already in runaway territory in some orbits — that is, debris from 1 collision likely produces more than one secondary…

      wimlView on HNParent context

    • > According to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b66ZZ05wKC0 this might end very badly very soon The paper they cite [1] estimates "the no-manoeuvre collision time" for various orbits. It has no alarming results. That paper cites another paper [2], which raises the possibility of…

      JumpCrisscrossView on HNParent context

    • great move, we're continually about 2 days away from kessler if we lost maneuvering control on a constellation like starlink (ofc that's vanishingly unlikely, but it's important to understand that continual maneuvering is what keeps space accessible to humanity) anything we can…

      thot_experimentView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.