The Erosion of LLM Signatures: Can We Still Distinguish Human and LLM-Generated Scientific Ideas After Iterative Paraphrasing? · HackerPapers discussionshttps://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.05311/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMTThe Erosion of LLM Signatures: Can We Still Distinguish Human and LLM-Generated Scientific Ideas After Iterative Paraphrasing? — mentioned by computerexhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49953652urn:hackerpapers:mention:2512.05311:49953652Sun, 04 Oct 2026 13:14:20 GMT<p>You are speaking out of your ass. https://arxiv.org/html/2512.05311v1 It’s not mathematically possible to reliably discern human writing from llm writing. &gt; It is, it&#x27;s disrespectful of the reader. Like others have said time and again across HN: why should I spend my time reading an article the &quot;author&quot; couldn&#x27;t even spend their own time writing? You are entitled to your opinion. As for me, I focus on the actual content and merits of the writing.</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.05311/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.LG