https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.03750/Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.enMon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMThttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46816778urn:hackerpapers:mention:2512.03750:46816778Thu, 29 Jan 2026 21:21:45 GMT<p>This was a common argument against LLMs, that the space of possible next tokens is so vast that eventually a long enough sequence will necessarily decay into nonsense, or at least that compounding error will have the same effect. Problem is, that&#x27;s not what we&#x27;ve observed to happen as these models get better. In reality there is some metaphysical coarse-grained substrate of physics/semantics/whatever[1] which these models can apparently construct for themselves in pursuit of ~whatever~ goal they&#x27;re after. The initially stated position, and your position: &quot;trying to hallucinate an entire world…</p><p><a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.03750/">Paper and discussion history</a>. A mention is not an endorsement.</p>cs.LGhttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46529299urn:hackerpapers:submission:2512.03750:46529299Wed, 07 Jan 2026 17:26:27 GMT<p>Universally Converging Representations of Matter in Scientific Foundation Models</p><p></p><p>1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. <a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.03750/">Paper and source history</a>. A submission is not an endorsement.</p>cs.LG