<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code in Real-World Tasks · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.03262/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:27:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.03262/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code in Real-World Tasks — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46820686</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2512.03262:46820686</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 04:58:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Show HN: I made a dev tool that helps vibecoders to AVOID security issues&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The first time I have heard about the vibecoding I could not believe that peeps without the technical background dare to release web apps and other type of software within the week of using such stuff like cursor, claude code and later lovable, bolt.new and etc. I saw some of the projects like that and despite them being somewhat functional - I could feel that security was not the strongest side of these pieces of software. As it turned out I was not hallucinating about the existance of the said security problem - lots of papers were published in this regard. For example, just last quarter 2…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.03262/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code in Real-World Tasks — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46210641</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2512.03262:46210641</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 21:05:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;4 points; 1 discussion reply on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.03262/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code in Real-World Tasks — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46200850</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2512.03262:46200850</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 03:13:01 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code in Real-World Tasks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.03262/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item><item><title>Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code in Real-World Tasks — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46194269</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2512.03262:46194269</guid><pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 16:29:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2512.03262/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.SE</category></item></channel></rss>
