<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>PEFT-Bench: A Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods Benchmark · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.21285/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.21285/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>PEFT-Bench: A Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning Methods Benchmark — mentioned by hereme888</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46098373</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2511.21285:46098373</guid><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2025 17:04:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;recent results like PEFT-Bench (arxiv.org/abs/2511.21285) found that while SFT is efficient for formatting, it actually degraded Llama-3-8B&amp;#x27;s reasoning on math and code tasks compared to the base model. So is RL required to preserve those logic circuits? There seems to be a trade-off in compute-efficiency and format vs intelligence&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.21285/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
