HackerPapers

arXiv:2511.19468cs.DC

Towards a future space-based, highly scalable AI infrastructure system design

Blaise Agüera y Arcas, Travis Beals, Maria Biggs, Jessica V. Bloom, Thomas Fischbacher, Konstantin Gromov, Urs Köster, Rishiraj Pravahan, James Manyika

Abstract

If AI is a foundational general-purpose technology, we should anticipate that demand for AI compute -- and energy -- will continue to grow. The Sun is by far the largest energy source in our solar system, and thus it warrants consideration how future AI infrastructure could most efficiently tap into that power. This work explores a scalable compute system for machine learning in space, using fleets of satellites equipped with solar arrays, inter-satellite links using free-space optics, and Google tensor processing unit (TPU) accelerator chips. To facilitate high-bandwidth, low-latency inter-satellite communication, the satellites would be flown in close proximity. We illustrate the basic approach to formation flight via an 81-satellite cluster of 1 km radius, and describe an approach for using high-precision ML-based models to control large-scale constellations. Trillium TPUs are radiation tested. They survive a total ionizing dose equivalent to a 5 year mission life without permanent failures, and are characterized for bit-flip errors. Launch costs are a critical part of overall system cost; a learning curve analysis suggests launch to low-Earth orbit (LEO) may reach $\lesssim$\$200/kg by the mid-2030s.

arXiv comments
18 pages, 4 figures. v2: Cleaned up references. Improved rough estimates. Fixed typos. Re-ran radiation test with improved methods
Journal reference
DOI
Subjects
cs.DCDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing cs.ETEmerging Technologies cs.LGMachine Learning physics.space-phSpace Physics

On Hacker News

Linked by 4 identifiable commenters in 9 comments across 8 threads, from Mar 2026 to Oct 2026. Found in 1 HN submission from Sep 2026 to Sep 2026. Open submission discussions.

Comments linking this paper, per year.

Discussed in comments8 threads

    • Yes for now; Alphabet is optimistic costs will come down. They're projecting the learning curve, that the more you do it the cheaper it gets, continues arbitrarily far. However, they recon it will take SpaceX launching 370,000 tons to LEO to make the costs come down enough to be…

      ben_wView on HNParent context

    • As per another of my comments, Alphabet, applying learning curves arbitrarily far into the future, recon it will take SpaceX launching 370,000 tons to LEO to make the costs come down enough to be worth it: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.19468 That's not even $100/kg, that's $200/kg.…

      ben_wView on HNParent context

    • The idea was from Google in a November 2025 paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.19468). Musk started talking about this only later in December 2025.

      rganesanView on HNParent context

    • Agreed on Starship. Orbital rings… I think are more like a century or two. Physical possibility and affordability will I think take only 25-100 years[0], the rest being politics getting to the point nobody shoots it up. [0] if you believe Alphabet's estimates about how fast…

      ben_wView on HNParent context

    • My draft blog post about all the things that are up with space data centres keeps getting bigger and bigger. "The other half of the MS model is data centres. “Orbital compute deployments” start in 2028, reach cost parity with their earthbound equivalents by 2031, and put 364GW…

      ben_wView on HNParent context

    • > Maybe you missed the part where starlink / orbiting datacenters don't really have to even make money as long as they partially fund rocket launch tests. I am only dismissing the orbital data centres, I do see a future for Starlink. One with competition, but a future…

      ben_wView on HNParent context

    • The competition isn't other launch providers, it's not going to space at all. According to Google, the price threshold to make space make more sensible than building on the ground is $200/kg: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.19468 Without full reusability, the estimated cost for…

      ben_wView on HNParent context

  1. SpaceX files to go public 1 comment
    • Try this one. You need to parse the hard data from all the speculation. So draw your own conclusions. https://www.aravolta.com/blog/datacenters-in-space As it stands, most if not all institutional and journalistic research around this topic I would consider compromised because…

      pilgrim0View on HNParent context

    • The Google paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.19468) didn’t seem too concerned with radiator mass/size when I skimmed it, but maybe I just missed it. My understanding is that if you run the chips relatively hot (and maybe boost with heat pumps? But then you’re not quite as solid…

      ericdView on HNParent context

Submitted to Hacker News

Connected through shared HN threads, not inferred similarity or a recommendation.