<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Can AI Models be Jailbroken to Phish Elderly Victims? An End-to-End Evaluation · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.11759/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.11759/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Can AI Models be Jailbroken to Phish Elderly Victims? An End-to-End Evaluation — mentioned by gerdesj</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45987623</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2511.11759:45987623</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2025 01:22:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a blog post about: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.11759 There are more links in the post. In the abstract of that paper: &amp;quot;In a human validation study with 108 senior vol- unteers, AI-generated phishing emails successfully compro- mised 11% of participants.&amp;quot; The Introduction mentions: &amp;quot;Americans aged 60 and older reported losses of nearly $4.9 billion to online fraud in 2024&amp;quot; I would say that is a big deal.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.11759/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
