<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Grand Challenge of Quantum Applications · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.09124/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.09124/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>The Grand Challenge of Quantum Applications — mentioned by vtomole</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46408629</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2511.09124:46408629</guid><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2025 05:08:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;#x27;re right. I didn&amp;#x27;t sufficiently separate experimental physics QC from engineering QC. On the engineering end, the question on if a large-scale quantum computer can be built is leaning to be &amp;quot;yes&amp;quot; so far. DARPA QBI https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/quantum-benchmarking... was made to answer this question and 11 teams have made it to Stage B. Of course, only people who believe DARPA will trust this evidence, but that&amp;#x27;s all I have to go on. On the application front, the jury is still out for applications that are not related to simulation or cryptography…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.09124/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item><item><title>The Grand Challenge of Quantum Applications — mentioned by vtomole</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46393344</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2511.09124:46393344</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 16:05:22 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;early days&amp;quot; means that the 1998 computer didn&amp;#x27;t have qubits that were below the error correction threshold. Now we have hundreds of qubits below threshold. We&amp;#x27;ll need millions of qubits like these for quantum computing to be useful. If that take decades, this is the &amp;quot;early days&amp;quot; relatively. It&amp;#x27;s not only early days in hardware, it&amp;#x27;s early days in practical applications as well: https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09124&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.09124/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>quant-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
