<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>PoCo: Agentic Proof-of-Concept Exploit Generation for Smart Contracts · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.02780/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.02780/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>PoCo: Agentic Proof-of-Concept Exploit Generation for Smart Contracts — mentioned by GustavHartz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47121332</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2511.02780:47121332</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 12:17:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Performance has gotten a lot better the last 6 months, at a level where we almost don&amp;#x27;t see it anymore at Cecuro.ai. PoC generation and multiple validation agents debating validity is the key differentiator. This is an ok paper on the topic https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.02780&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2511.02780/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
