<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>You Don't Need Prompt Engineering Anymore: The Prompting Inversion · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.22251/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.22251/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>You Don't Need Prompt Engineering Anymore: The Prompting Inversion — mentioned by 88j88</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48200762</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.22251:48200762</guid><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 22:53:59 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Something very similar I was experimenting with on, but had different results that you may be interested in, some of my findings were interesting This was part of testing out how well a tool of mine worked (github.com/jsuppe/loom), which aims to be used to extracts requirements, specs, creates tests. At first I had no intention of using it for code generation but then tried it out with some early success. I tried splitting the work by using the tool with different frontier models, and then providing work to a local ollama instance running one of several models. Not all local models had the…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.22251/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CL</category></item></channel></rss>
