<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Propellantless space exploration · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.21743/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.21743/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Propellantless space exploration — mentioned by hbrav</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45932718</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.21743:45932718</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2025 22:04:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This article is quite frustrating, since all that it really tells me is that their system &amp;quot;generates thrust without using any propellant and without expelling reaction mass, by directly converting electrical energy into thrust through controlled electromagnetic impulses&amp;quot;. That&amp;#x27;s rather non-specific. My first thought was that they&amp;#x27;re using photon momentum, but thinking about that a little harder rules it out. The ratio of energy to momentum doesn&amp;#x27;t change with any properties of the photon (they&amp;#x27;re both proportional to frequency) so there&amp;#x27;s nothing to really develop there: so long as you waste…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.21743/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>physics.pop-ph</category></item></channel></rss>
