<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>A Definition of AGI · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.18212/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.18212/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>A Definition of AGI — mentioned by rvz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49712294</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.18212:49712294</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 13:32:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; AI, AGI, and intelligence itself are poorly defined. Of course they are. The previous definitions were not credible and nonsensical. &amp;gt; I invite you to add to the literature if you think you have any novel insight, and get it published. That has been already done. You might want to start here: [0] - A Definition of AGI Let&amp;#x27;s read the agreed (Gary Marcus approved) definition together: &amp;quot;AGI is an AI that can match or exceed the cognitive versatility and proficiency of a well-educated adult.&amp;quot; What other well-educated adult can claim that they gave a rigorous solution to an unsolved mathematical…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.18212/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>A Definition of AGI — mentioned by hereme888</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49579792</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.18212:49579792</guid><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 19:25:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#x27;t think there will ever be universal consensus on....anything. But significant research has been published into its definition, by researchers from the main LLM providers, like https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18212 Also, I would say SOTA LLM models can sustain a longer, more intelligent conversation than most people. Just in context length alone, they can keep track of more context than humans. But they&amp;#x27;re nowhere near as efficient the human brain, or the attention to quickly connect and find decades worth of memory like us.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.18212/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>A Definition of AGI — mentioned by dupdup</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45859949</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.18212:45859949</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 21:03:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;for me the definition of AGI is the tool to measure https://arxiv.org/html/2510.18212v2&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.18212/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>A Definition of AGI — mentioned by cs702</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45802274</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.18212:45802274</guid><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:15:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Many people who object to the idea that current-generation AI is thinking do so only because they believe AI is not &amp;quot;conscious&amp;quot;... but there is no known law in the universe requiring that intelligence and consciousness must always go together. With apologies to René Descartes[a], intelligence and consciousness are different. Intelligence can be verified and quantified, for example, with tests of common sense and other knowledge.[b] Consciousness, on the other hand, is notoriously difficult if not impossible to verify, let alone quantify. I&amp;#x27;d say AI is getting more intelligent, and more…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.18212/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>A Definition of AGI — mentioned by viraptor</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45776219</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.18212:45776219</guid><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 20:15:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#x27;s been an issue for a while, but just a week ago: A definition of AGI https://arxiv.org/html/2510.18212v2 The consciousness will have to wait for another time. But that one&amp;#x27;s likely to be extremely contentious and more of a philosophy question without practical impact.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.18212/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>A Definition of AGI — mentioned by gre</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45733360</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.18212:45733360</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 14:30:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;They are trying. A Definition of AGI - https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18212 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45713959&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.18212/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>A Definition of AGI — mentioned by Insanity</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45733171</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.18212:45733171</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 14:13:27 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;That line essentially means &amp;#x27;indefinite support&amp;#x27;. This paper was published some days ago that aims to define AGI: https://www.arxiv.org/abs/2510.18212. But crucially, there is no agreed-upon definition of AGI. And I don&amp;#x27;t think we&amp;#x27;re close to anything that resembles human intelligence. I firmly believe that stochastic parrots will not get us to AGI and that we need a different methodology. I&amp;#x27;m sure humanity will eventually create AGI, and perhaps even in my lifetime (in the next few decades). But I wouldn&amp;#x27;t put my money on that bet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.18212/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>A Definition of AGI — mentioned by Animats</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45717052</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.18212:45717052</guid><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 03:12:19 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.18212 That 10-axis radial graph is very interesting. Do others besides this author agree with that representation? The weak points are speed and long-term memory. Those are usually fixable in computing system. Weak long-term memory indicates that, somehow, a database needs to be bolted on. I&amp;#x27;ve seen at least one system, for driving NPCs, where, after something interesting has happened, the system is asked to summarize what it learned from that session. That&amp;#x27;s stored somewhere outside the LLM and fed back in as a prompt when needed. None of this addresses…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.18212/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>A Definition of AGI — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45713959</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2510.18212:45713959</guid><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2025 18:09:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A definition of AGI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;305 points; 514 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.18212/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>A Definition of AGI — mentioned by photonthug</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45704809</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.18212:45704809</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 15:55:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;You might prefer this sort of thing: A Definition of AGI https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18212&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.18212/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
