<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>CLASP: Training-Free LLM-Assisted Source Code Watermarking via Semantic-Preserving Transformations · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.11251/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.11251/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>CLASP: Training-Free LLM-Assisted Source Code Watermarking via Semantic-Preserving Transformations — mentioned by vektormemory</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48784356</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.11251:48784356</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 10:34:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;A weekend project about LLM guardrails, copyright, and why proving your code is yours turned out to be a lot more complex than it should be. This is a firsthand look into an experimental weekend project, not legal advice. If any of this matters to your actual business, talk to an actual lawyer in your jurisdiction. I use multiple LLMs daily as idea generators for code, production work, and research. So don’t read the next few paragraphs as naive surprises. I’m not pointing fingers at the model providers or pretending I didn’t know what I was walking into over the last 4 years of use. I’m just…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.11251/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
