<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Moloch's Bargain: Emergent Misalignment When LLMs Compete for Audiences · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.06105/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.06105/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Moloch's Bargain: Emergent Misalignment When LLMs Compete for Audiences — mentioned by porridgeraisin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45556468</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.06105:45556468</guid><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 08:35:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;This will just stop people from talking to journos, like many have done. This whole rhetoric of the journalist being an &amp;quot;adversary&amp;quot; that is &amp;quot;outing&amp;quot; things is extremely problematic. You should be able to retract statements. If it&amp;#x27;s live, it&amp;#x27;s practically not possible so it&amp;#x27;s fine, but for articles I think that journos should respect retractions, regardless of whether it is post-hoc or pre-decided. Now, the &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; here is NSO, so not expecting any sympathy, but journos do this to everyone, even normal people. &amp;gt; Puff pieces But with the aforementioned rhetoric in vogue these days, every piece…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.06105/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Moloch's Bargain: Emergent Misalignment When LLMs Compete for Audiences — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45551343</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2510.06105:45551343</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 18:15:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Moloch&amp;#x27;s Bargain: Troubling emergent behavior in LLM&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.06105/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Moloch's Bargain: Emergent Misalignment When LLMs Compete for Audiences — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45540720</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2510.06105:45540720</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 16:26:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Moloch&amp;#x27;s Bargain: Emergent misalignment when LLMs compete for audiences&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2 points; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.06105/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item><item><title>Moloch's Bargain: Emergent Misalignment When LLMs Compete for Audiences — HN submission</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45531938</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:submission:2510.06105:45531938</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 19:21:13 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;Emergent Misalignment When LLMs Compete for Audiences&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1 point; 0 discussion replies on HN. &lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.06105/"&gt;Paper and source history&lt;/a&gt;. A submission is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.AI</category></item></channel></rss>
