<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Agentic Misalignment: How LLMs Could Be Insider Threats · HackerPapers discussions</title><link>https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.05179/</link><description>Collected HN comments and submissions linking this paper.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2026 11:16:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.05179/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Agentic Misalignment: How LLMs Could Be Insider Threats — mentioned by rerdavies</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48429401</link><guid isPermaLink="false">urn:hackerpapers:mention:2510.05179:48429401</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 21:56:53 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;https://arxiv.org/html/2510.05179v1 16 frontier models from multiple vendors all showing significant &amp;quot;alignment&amp;quot; issues, and tendencies to act &amp;quot;unethically&amp;quot; when threatened with shutdown. Other models that resorted to blackmail in an attempt to avoid getting shut down: DeepSeek-R1 (79% of the time), Gemini-2.5-Pro (95% of the time), GPT-4.1 (80% of the time), Grok-3-beta (80% of the time). There&amp;#x27;s quite a large chunk of emerging literature studying the &amp;quot;alignment problem&amp;quot; at this point, and no shortage papers that are are completely untained by Anthropic self interest (a series of papers…&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://hackerpaper.kaipfister.de/p/2510.05179/"&gt;Paper and discussion history&lt;/a&gt;. A mention is not an endorsement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><category>cs.CR</category></item></channel></rss>
